NAACP’s Honoring of Van Jones is an Insult to the Black Community

Posted on February 25, 2010 at 1:30 am by Andy Sochor

Van Jones, the former Green Jobs czar for President Obama, is to be given the NAACP Image Award this Friday. This award “celebrates the outstanding achievements and performances of people of color in the arts and literature, as well as individuals or groups who promote social justice through their creative endeavors” [source].

If I were a black man, I would be deeply offended by this recognition for Jones. Why? First, let’s remember two points:

  • Van Jones is a communist. Even in his work as Green Jobs czar, he was not just interested in creating “green” jobs. He wanted to “change the whole system.”
  • The NAACP is the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

So what is so insulting about this award being given to Van Jones?

The NAACP organization has as it’s fundamental purpose the advancement of blacks. Their desire is for the state of those in the black community to improve. That’s great! I want that too. But judging from their decision to give this award to Van Jones, it would appear that my thinking as to how to improve the situation of the black community is very different from the thinking of the NAACP.

The goal of communism is equality. Not equality in opportunity, mind you, but equality in outcomes. In a communist system, money is taken from the rich and given to the poor. For this to work, you have to have a strong centralized government to take from the rich and redistribute the wealth to the poor.

What “advancement” occurs in a communist system? If you’re rich, you don’t advance at all. In fact, you regress. (So don’t bother working hard. The fruit of your success will just be taken from you to give to the unsuccessful.) If you’re in the middle, you don’t advance either. You just stay right where you are. (So don’t bother working hard. You can’t improve your situation.) If you’re poor, you advance by having the money that was taken from the rich and given to you. (So don’t bother working hard. You’ll be taken care of just the same.)

Notice the pattern? No matter if you’re rich, middle class, or poor, you have no incentive to work hard. No wonder communism has failed in every country in which it was implemented.

So back to Van Jones and the NAACP.

The NAACP wants the black community to advance. The communist ideology of those like Van Jones states that advancement comes, not through hard work, but from a benevolent government that is simply using money that was taken from one group of citizens to give to another.

Does the NAACP really think so little of the black community that they believe communist ideology is something that should be awarded? Do they think that individuals in the black community are so incapable of working hard and improving their own situation that they must rely upon the government to support them? Whether they believe this or not, this is the message that is being sent with their recognition of Van Jones.

I, however, choose to believe better of the black community. I believe that individuals (white, black, hispanic, whatever) who are willing to work hard, do what is right, and take responsibility for their own actions are able to make it and even advance in a free society. Will everyone’s outcomes be equal? Of course not. But everyone’s opportunity is equal.

If the NAACP really wants to help the black community advance, they need to be preaching the virtues of hard work and personal responsibility, rather than encouraging people to become enslaved through their dependence upon government.


2 Comments »

  1. Ironically, the Democratic party, the party that purports to be so very interested in the betterment of the Black community, is in fact advancing policies that will once again ENSLAVE the Black community. Their policies constitute economic slavery. High tax, big government policies hurt Blacks as much as they do Whites. Many Blacks, like Whites, simply want the opportunity to compete on a level playing field. That is, an arena of action and ideas in which the same rules equally apply to all parties. Obama’s crony capitalism/socialism, with its preferences for certain groups and businesses, does not provide such an opportunity.

    Comment by Tim Haile – February 25, 2010
  2. You know, one could argue that slavery could potentially be a good thing. The slave provides service to his master. His master in turn provides food, clothing, and housing to the slave (almost as if they were wages). The slave was unable to improve his situation (unless he ran away), but except in the case of mistreatment, the slave was guaranteed his basic needs.

    But we know the history of slavery in this country. It didn’t work well. Why not? The masters abused their power and instead of treating their slaves fairly, they treated them harshly and in most cases, the slaves were powerless to fight back.

    In the same way, one could argue that socialism/communism is a good thing. The citizens work. The government provides their needs – food, shelter, etc. The problem is one of power. If we give government the power to feed us, clothe us, house us, etc., they own us. In theory, this can work if somehow you had a government that was omnipotent, benevolent, and fair. But history has shown that this never translates into reality. Either the government is incapable of helping all those in need, or they don’t want to, or they simply cannot do so equally. This is why communism has failed every time. The best option then is freedom.

    Comment by Andy – February 25, 2010

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


Subscribe

Subscribe to the feed for all of our posts

Other subscription options

Recent Posts

Plain Punditry Parody

Archives

Past articles are sorted by month

Log in